[ ... ]

You're talking about two different things though, aren't you? Related, to an extent, but... If I understand you, then you aren't allowed to present any information specific to this particular incident that may sway us one way or the other, correct?

But you also said you would be doing your own investigation into the corruption. If it has the potential to be a recurring threat or concern, then that information isn't strictly specific to this case, is it? There'd be no point in you investigating on your own if in the end, you wouldn't be able to tell us any of your findings anyway-- especially when you're meant to be our guides.

[ whatever. that actually means. enforcer? arbitrator? too early to say... ]

Or is it that you simply cannot present it publicly, without having had something be paid for it first?